The Importance Of Dynamic Cervical MRI In The Diagnosis And Treatment Of Cervical Spondilotic Myeloradiculopathy
Research Article
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10156111Keywords:
Cervical spondylotic myelopathy, cervical spondylotic radiculopathy, dynamic magnetic resonance imagingAbstract
Introducttion and Objective: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy and cervical spondylotic radiculopathy are the most common degenerative spine pathologies in middle-aged individuals. The cervical vertebra is the most mobile part of the spine. Although radiological examinations give information about the structure of the spine, they do not provide any functional data. This study aimed to investigate whether dynamic magnetic resonance imaging helps make the surgical decision of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Method: In this study, the clinical features, radiological findings and surgical results of 258 SSM and/or CSR patients, 123 women and 135 men, who underwent surgical treatment were examined. Canal diameters on lateral radiographs and anterior-posterior diameters on axial CT sections were measured for all levels. The diameters of the canal were measured for all levels in the flexion, extension, and neutral anteroposterior axial MRI section. The clinical status of the patients was evaluated according to the four common classifications used for SSM (JOA, Nurick, Mann and Symon, and Launder).
Results: According to the mean AP diameter values in dynamic MRI examinations, it was observed that the canal expanded by an average of 1.05 mm (14.9%) in flexion (8.09 mm) and narrowed by 0.94 mm (13.4%) in extension (6.10 mm). The difference between mean flexion and extension MRI results was 1.99 mm. The difference between MRI and CT measurements was statistically significant (Student t-test, p<0.001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p<0.05). Dynamic MRI has been found to be particularly helpful in visualizing the dynamic causes of SSM etiology. While instability was suspected in 25.6% of the cases in routine X-rays, instability was found in 54.3% after dynamic MRI examinations. It is observed that retrolisthesis especially in hyperextension and segmental excessive movement in hyperflexion.
Conclusion: Correlation between transverse area measurements as well as sagittal and axial dynamic MR images taken during flexion and extension should be established, and surgical planning should be done accordingly. Cord compression and transverse area of the cord, changes in the spinal cord area, and subarachnoid space, the most important prognostic indicators in spinal cord diseases, can be detected by dynamic axial sections of MR images. Dynamic MR images can assist in decision-making regarding the surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
References
Goh BC, Lightsey HM 4th, Lopez WY, et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is Inadequate to Assess Cervical Sagittal Alignment Parameters. Clin Spine Surg. 2023;36(2):E70-E74. doi:10.1097/BSD.0000000000001382
Chang CJ, Liu YF, Hsiao YM, et al. Full Endoscopic Spine Surgery for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Systematic Review. World Neurosurg. 2023;175:142-150. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2023.05.012
Li AY, McCarthy L, Hrabarchuk E, et al. Novel Grading Scales for Static and Flexion-Extension Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy. World Neurosurg. 2023;173:e218-e227. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2023.02.034
Tian XN, Zhang L, Liu HR, Zhang XS, Sun YC, Wang Y. Predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging indications of spinal cord swelling for cervical spondylotic myelopathy prognosis. Technol Health Care. 2023 Apr 19. doi:10.3233/THC-220614
Makhchoune M, Triffaux M, Bouras T, Lonneville S, Marie-Anne L. The value of dynamic MRI in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: About 24 cases. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022;83:104717. doi:10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104717
Williams J, D'Amore P, Redlich N, et al. Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Evaluation and Management. Orthop Clin North Am. 2022;53(4):509-521. doi:10.1016/j.ocl.2022.05.007
Vázquez-Sánchez F, Lloria-Gil MDC, Gómez-Menéndez AI, et al. The Role of Magnetic Transcranial Stimulation in the Diagnosis and Post-Surgical Follow-Up of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(4):3690. doi:10.3390/ijerph20043690
Nozawa K, Maki S, Furuya T, et al. Magnetic resonance image segmentation of the compressed spinal cord in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy using convolutional neural networks. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2023;18(1):45-54. doi:10.1007/s11548-022-02783-0
Ridia KGM, Astawa P, Deslivia MF, Santosa C, Savio SD. A Systematic Review of Scoring System Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameters to Predict Outcome in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury. Spine Surg Relat Res. 2022;7(1):1-12. doi:10.22603/ssrr.2021-0255
He B, Sheldrick K, Das A, Diwan A. Clinical and Research MRI Techniques for Assessing Spinal Cord Integrity in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy-A Scoping Review. Biomedicines. 2022;10(10):2621. doi:10.3390/biomedicines10102621
Ni M, Wen X, Zhang M, et al. Predictive Value of the Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technique for the Postoperative Outcome of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2023 May 18. doi:10.1002/jmri.28789
Khan AF, Haynes G, Mohammadi E, Muhammad F, Hameed S, Smith ZA. Utility of MRI in Quantifying Tissue Injury in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy. J Clin Med. 2023;12(9):3337. doi:10.3390/jcm12093337
Takamiya S, Iwasaki M, Yokohama T, Oura D, Niiya Y, Fujimura M. The Prediction of Neurological Prognosis for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging. Neurospine. 2023;20(1):248-254. doi:10.14245/ns.2244708.354
Nguyen-Van T, Hoang GD, Nguyen-Le BT, et al. Prognostic factors for surgical outcomes among patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022;26(17):6242-6250. doi:10.26355/eurrev_202209_29647
Yang HE, Kim WT, Kim DH, Kim SW, Yoo WK. Utility of Diffusion and Magnetization Transfer MRI in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Pilot Study. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;12(9):2090. doi:10.3390/diagnostics12092090
Khosravi S, Farahbakhsh F, Hesari M, et al. Predictors of Outcome After Surgical Decompression for mild degenerative Cervical Myelopathy -A Systematic Review. Global Spine J. 2023:21925682231164346. doi:10.1177/21925682231164346
Dave BR, Krishnan A, Rai RR, Degulmadi D, Mayi S, Patidar V. Does MR Signal Intensity Change have Prognostic Value in Multilevel Cervical Myelopathy? A Single-Center, Prospective Study. Neurol India. 2023;71(2):285-290. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.375382
Luyao H, Xiaoxiao Y, Tianxiao F, Yuandong L, Ping Wang. Management of Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy: A Systematic review. Global Spine J. 2022;12(8):1912-1924. doi: 10.1177/21925682221075290
Hesni S, Baxter D, Saifuddin A. The imaging of cervical spondylotic myeloradiculopathy. Skeletal Radiol. 2023 Apr 18. doi:10.1007/s00256-023-04329-0
Waddell WH, Vaughan WE, Abtahi AM. Radiographic Parameters in Cervical Myelopathy: Review of Current Literature. Clin Spine Surg. 2022;35(10):389-395. doi:10.1097/BSD.0000000000001412
Ye LQ, Chen C, Liu YH, Li Z, Lu GL. Effect of cervical spine motion on displacement of posterolateral annulus fibrosus in cervical spondylotic radiculopathy with contained posterolateral disc herniation: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022;17(1):548. doi:10.1186/s13018-022-03450-5
Liu Q, Shao H, Liu C, et al. Quantitative evaluation of the spinal cord compression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy using synthetic MRI. Front Physiol. 2023;14:1140870. doi:10.3389/fphys.2023.1140870
Louie PK, Nemani VM, Leveque JA. Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion for Degenerative Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Case Presentation With Surgical Technique Demonstration and Review of Literature. Clin Spine Surg. 2022;35(10):440-446. doi:10.1097/BSD.0000000000001410
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Acta Medica Ruha
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.